Quadro P400 vs Radeon PRO WX 9100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO WX 9100 and Quadro P400, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

PRO WX 9100
2017
16 GB HBM2, 230 Watt
27.72
+641%

PRO WX 9100 outperforms P400 by a whopping 641% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking216729
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.840.93
Power efficiency9.7010.03
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameVega 10GP107
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 July 2017 (8 years ago)7 February 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 $119.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

PRO WX 9100 has 313% better value for money than Quadro P400.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096256
Core clock speed1200 MHz1228 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1252 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate384.020.03
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS0.641 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs25616
L1 Cache1 MB96 KB
L2 Cache4 MB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm145 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz1002 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s32.06 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort3x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

PRO WX 9100 27.72
+641%
Quadro P400 3.74

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO WX 9100 Samples: 106 12258
+642%
Quadro P400 Samples: 877 1653

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

PRO WX 9100 66605
+1086%
Quadro P400 5615

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

PRO WX 9100 67893
+1226%
Quadro P400 5122

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.72 3.74
Recency 10 July 2017 7 February 2017
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 30 Watt

PRO WX 9100 has a 641.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, and a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Quadro P400, on the other hand, has 666.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO WX 9100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P400 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Radeon PRO WX 9100
NVIDIA Quadro P400
Quadro P400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 34 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 522 votes

Rate Quadro P400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO WX 9100 or Quadro P400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.