Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon PRO WX 9100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon Instinct MI25 Radeon Pro V320 Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU Radeon Pro V340 Radeon Pro V340 8 GB Radeon Pro V340 16 GB Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU Radeon Pro WX 8100 Radeon Pro WX 8200 Radeon PRO WX 9100 Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled
VS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO WX 9100 with Iris Xe Graphics G7, including specs and performance data.

PRO WX 9100
2017
16 GB HBM2, 230 Watt
31.22
+211%

PRO WX 9100 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by a whopping 211% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

PRO WX 9100 PRO WX 9100
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking181447
Place by popularitynot in top-10017
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.13no data
Power efficiency9.53no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameVega 10Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 July 2017 (7 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409696
Core clock speed1200 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Wattno data
Texture fill rate384.0no data
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs256no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR4
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width2048 Bitno data
Memory clock speed945 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPortno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.1.125-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 42 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 31.22 10.05
Recency 10 July 2017 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

PRO WX 9100 has a 210.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO WX 9100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 9100 is a workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Radeon PRO WX 9100
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

PRO WX 9100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
vs
Tesla P40 Tesla P40
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
vs
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
PRO WX 9100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
vs
Pro 5700 XT Radeon Pro 5700 XT
RTX 3070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
vs
FX 5600 FX 5600
GT 1030 GK107 NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107
vs
R5 310 OEM R5 310 OEM
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
GeForce MX550 GeForce MX550
UHD Graphics 710 Mobile Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile
vs
HD Graphics 3000 HD Graphics 3000
Pro 580 AMD Radeon Pro 580
vs
R9 390X R9 390X
ATI HD 2900 GT ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
vs
HD Graphics 4400 HD Graphics 4400
Playstation 3 RSX NVIDIA Playstation 3 RSX
vs
R7 M340 R7 M340
RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
RTX 3050 8 GB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
vs
Pro 5500 XT Pro 5500 XT
Arc A550M Intel Arc A550M
vs
Iris Xe Graphics MAX Xe Graphics MAX

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 33 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2674 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO WX 9100 or Iris Xe Graphics G7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.