GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Radeon PRO WX 9100

#ad 
Buy Radeon PRO WX 9100
Instinct MI25 Pro V320 Pro V320 MxGPU Pro V340 Pro V340 8 GB Pro V340 16 GB Pro V340 MxGPU Pro WX 8100 Pro WX 8200 PRO WX 9100 Vega Frontier Edition Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled
VS
4050 Max-Q 4050 Mobile 4060 Max-Q 4060 Mobile 4060 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO WX 9100 with GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

PRO WX 9100
2017
16 GB HBM2, 230 Watt
30.76

RTX 4050 Mobile outperforms PRO WX 9100 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
PRO WX 9100 PRO WX 9100
RTX 4050 Mobile RTX 4050

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking200148
Place by popularitynot in top-10037
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.81no data
Power efficiency9.4651.14
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10AD107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 July 2017 (7 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962560
Core clock speed1200 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1755 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate384.0140.4
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS8.986 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs25680
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB6 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz16000 GB/s
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

PRO WX 9100 30.76
RTX 4050 Mobile 36.14
+17.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO WX 9100 12285
RTX 4050 Mobile 14431
+17.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD80−85
−18.8%
95
+18.8%
1440p40−45
−25%
50
+25%
4K24−27
−25%
30
+25%

Cost per frame, $

1080p19.99no data
1440p39.98no data
4K66.63no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 94
+0%
94
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 103
+0%
103
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 76
+0%
76
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 166
+0%
166
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 82
+0%
82
+0%
Far Cry 5 124
+0%
124
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 115
+0%
115
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 65
+0%
65
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
+0%
69
+0%
Dota 2 169
+0%
169
+0%
Far Cry 5 114
+0%
114
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 108
+0%
108
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 125
+0%
125
+0%
Metro Exodus 85
+0%
85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156
+0%
156
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 65
+0%
65
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65
+0%
65
+0%
Dota 2 162
+0%
162
+0%
Far Cry 5 107
+0%
107
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80
+0%
80
+0%
Valorant 138
+0%
138
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 79
+0%
79
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 58
+0%
58
+0%
Metro Exodus 50
+0%
50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 43
+0%
43
+0%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+0%
37
+0%
Far Cry 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
+0%
58
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 41
+0%
41
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24
+0%
24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60
+0%
60
+0%
Metro Exodus 45
+0%
45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+0%
45
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 22
+0%
22
+0%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Dota 2 115
+0%
115
+0%
Far Cry 5 43
+0%
43
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how PRO WX 9100 and RTX 4050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4050 Mobile is 19% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4050 Mobile is 25% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4050 Mobile is 25% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 30.76 36.14
Recency 10 July 2017 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 50 Watt

PRO WX 9100 has a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 17.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 360% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 9100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 9100 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Radeon PRO WX 9100
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4050
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

PRO WX 9100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
vs
Tesla P40 Tesla P40
RTX 4050 Mobile GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
vs
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
PRO WX 9100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
vs
Pro 5700 XT Radeon Pro 5700 XT
RTX A5500 Mobile RTX A5500 Mobile
vs
P3000 Mobile Quadro P3000 Mobile
Pro 5700 XT Radeon Pro 5700 XT
vs
P106-100 P106 100
Playstation 5 Pro GPU Playstation 5 Pro GPU
vs
Instinct MI25 Radeon Instinct MI25
CMP 90HX CMP 90HX
vs
Tesla V100 PCIe Tesla V100 PCIe
RTX 4060 Mobile GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
vs
GT 710 PCI GeForce GT 710 PCI
RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7600 XT
vs
PRO WX 9100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
GT 740M GeForce GT 740M
vs
RX Vega 56 Radeon RX Vega 56
FirePro W2100 FirePro W2100
vs
RX Vega 56 Radeon RX Vega 56
ATI 7000 PCI Radeon 7000 PCI
vs
RX Vega 56 Radeon RX Vega 56
UHD Graphics 710 UHD Graphics 710
vs
RX Vega 56 Radeon RX Vega 56

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 33 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3286 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO WX 9100 or GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.