GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs Radeon PRO WX 9100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon Instinct MI25 Radeon Pro V320 Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU Radeon Pro V340 Radeon Pro V340 8 GB Radeon Pro V340 16 GB Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU Radeon Pro WX 8100 Radeon Pro WX 8200 Radeon PRO WX 9100 Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh RTX 2070 Mobile RTX 2070 Max-Q RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO WX 9100 with GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

PRO WX 9100
2017
16 GB HBM2, 230 Watt
31.66
+6%

PRO WX 9100 outperforms RTX 2070 Max-Q by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

PRO WX 9100 PRO WX 9100
RTX 2070 Max-Q RTX 2070 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking180195
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.15no data
Power efficiency9.5826.00
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVega 10TU106B
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 July 2017 (7 years ago)29 January 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962304
Core clock speed1200 MHz885 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1185 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate384.0170.6
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS5.46 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs256144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO WX 9100 31.66
+6%
RTX 2070 Max-Q 29.88

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO WX 9100 12285
+6%
RTX 2070 Max-Q 11593

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+2%
98
−2%
1440p60−65
+5.3%
57
−5.3%
4K40−45
−2.5%
41
+2.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p15.99no data
1440p26.65no data
4K39.98no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 76
+0%
76
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 93
+0%
93
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 150
+0%
150
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+0%
27
+0%
Dota 2 102
+0%
102
+0%
Far Cry 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 90
+0%
90
+0%
Metro Exodus 68
+0%
68
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 214
+0%
214
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 48
+0%
48
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 64
+0%
64
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Dota 2 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 129
+0%
129
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 78
+0%
78
+0%
Valorant 129
+0%
129
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 29
+0%
29
+0%
World of Tanks 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55
+0%
55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 72
+0%
72
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 95
+0%
95
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 69
+0%
69
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 69
+0%
69
+0%
Metro Exodus 22
+0%
22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100
+0%
100
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 19
+0%
19
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 69
+0%
69
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 29
+0%
29
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 93
+0%
93
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 32
+0%
32
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 55
+0%
55
+0%

This is how PRO WX 9100 and RTX 2070 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • PRO WX 9100 is 2% faster in 1080p
  • PRO WX 9100 is 5% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Max-Q is 3% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 31.66 29.88
Recency 10 July 2017 29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 80 Watt

PRO WX 9100 has a 6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 2070 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 187.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon PRO WX 9100 and GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 9100 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Radeon PRO WX 9100
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

PRO WX 9100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
vs
Tesla P40 Tesla P40
RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
vs
RTX 2060 Mobile GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
PRO WX 9100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
vs
Pro 5700 XT Radeon Pro 5700 XT
P3000 Mobile Quadro P3000 Mobile
vs
R7 350X OEM Radeon R7 350X OEM
P106-100 P106 100
vs
RX 7700 XT Radeon RX 7700 XT
Tesla V100 PCIe Tesla V100 PCIe
vs
Pro W6600 Radeon Pro W6600
PRO WX 9100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
vs
GTX 1060 3 GB GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
PRO WX 9100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
vs
GT 730 GeForce GT 730
PRO WX 9100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
vs
RTX 4090 D GeForce RTX 4090 D
PRO WX 9100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
vs
GTX 1080 Ti 12 GB GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 12 GB
RX 560D Radeon RX 560D
vs
T400 T400
Quadro GP100 Quadro GP100
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
RX Vega 64 Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
HD 7970M Crossfire Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 33 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 359 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.