GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon PRO WX 9100

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO WX 9100 with GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, including specs and performance data.

PRO WX 9100
2017
16 GB HBM2, 230 Watt
31.11
+20.9%

PRO WX 9100 outperforms GTX 1650 SUPER by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking179215
Place by popularitynot in top-10048
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.09no data
Power efficiency9.5518.18
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVega 10TU116
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 July 2017 (7 years ago)22 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961280
Core clock speed1200 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1725 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate384.0138.0
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS4.416 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs25680

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO WX 9100 31.11
+20.9%
GTX 1650 SUPER 25.74

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO WX 9100 12285
+20.9%
GTX 1650 SUPER 10164

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

PRO WX 9100 66605
+19.5%
GTX 1650 SUPER 55744

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

PRO WX 9100 67893
+27.3%
GTX 1650 SUPER 53337

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD80−85
+14.3%
70
−14.3%
1440p40−45
+11.1%
36
−11.1%
4K27−30
+17.4%
23
−17.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p19.99no data
1440p39.98no data
4K59.22no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 61
+0%
61
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+0%
63
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 48
+0%
48
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+0%
47
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 121
+0%
121
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Metro Exodus 89
+0%
89
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 84
+0%
84
+0%
Valorant 115
+0%
115
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 39
+0%
39
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 38
+0%
38
+0%
Dota 2 138
+0%
138
+0%
Far Cry 5 151
+0%
151
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 101
+0%
101
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 103
+0%
103
+0%
Metro Exodus 61
+0%
61
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30
+0%
30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
World of Tanks 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35
+0%
35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Dota 2 191
+0%
191
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 83
+0%
83
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 11
+0%
11
+0%
World of Tanks 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+0%
19
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60
+0%
60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 54
+0%
54
+0%
Metro Exodus 55
+0%
55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45
+0%
Metro Exodus 16
+0%
16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+0%
45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2
+0%
2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+0%
5
+0%
Dota 2 80
+0%
80
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how PRO WX 9100 and GTX 1650 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • PRO WX 9100 is 14% faster in 1080p
  • PRO WX 9100 is 11% faster in 1440p
  • PRO WX 9100 is 17% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.11 25.74
Recency 10 July 2017 22 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 100 Watt

PRO WX 9100 has a 20.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650 SUPER, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 130% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO WX 9100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 9100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Radeon PRO WX 9100
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 33 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 4872 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.