RTX A4000 vs Radeon PRO WX 3100

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO WX 3100 and RTX A4000, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

PRO WX 3100
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 65 Watt
6.56

RTX A4000 outperforms PRO WX 3100 by a whopping 657% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking57263
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.93no data
Power efficiency7.0924.90
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameLexaGA104
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date12 June 2017 (7 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5126144
Core clock speed925 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate39.01299.5
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPS19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs32192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mm241 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

PRO WX 3100 6.56
RTX A4000 49.64
+657%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO WX 3100 2583
RTX A4000 19532
+656%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

PRO WX 3100 7624
RTX A4000 121339
+1492%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−614%
100−110
+614%

Cost per frame, $

1080p14.21no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
−633%
110−120
+633%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−631%
95−100
+631%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−631%
95−100
+631%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
−633%
110−120
+633%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−641%
200−210
+641%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−631%
95−100
+631%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−631%
95−100
+631%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−637%
140−150
+637%
Fortnite 35−40
−637%
280−290
+637%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−650%
210−220
+650%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−633%
110−120
+633%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−639%
170−180
+639%
Valorant 70−75
−614%
500−550
+614%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
−633%
110−120
+633%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−641%
200−210
+641%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−631%
95−100
+631%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
−621%
750−800
+621%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−631%
95−100
+631%
Dota 2 50−55
−600%
350−400
+600%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−637%
140−150
+637%
Fortnite 35−40
−637%
280−290
+637%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−650%
210−220
+650%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−633%
110−120
+633%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−639%
170−180
+639%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−650%
90−95
+650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−639%
170−180
+639%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
−650%
90−95
+650%
Valorant 70−75
−614%
500−550
+614%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−641%
200−210
+641%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−631%
95−100
+631%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−631%
95−100
+631%
Dota 2 50−55
−600%
350−400
+600%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−637%
140−150
+637%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−650%
210−220
+650%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−633%
110−120
+633%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−639%
170−180
+639%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−614%
50−55
+614%
Valorant 70−75
−614%
500−550
+614%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
−637%
280−290
+637%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
−629%
350−400
+629%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
−650%
60−65
+650%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−637%
280−290
+637%
Valorant 70−75
−604%
500−550
+604%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−627%
80−85
+627%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−631%
95−100
+631%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−633%
110−120
+633%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−650%
75−80
+650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−650%
75−80
+650%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−631%
95−100
+631%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−606%
120−130
+606%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Valorant 30−35
−650%
240−250
+650%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Dota 2 21−24
−627%
160−170
+627%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−650%
75−80
+650%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%

This is how PRO WX 3100 and RTX A4000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4000 is 614% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.56 49.64
Recency 12 June 2017 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 140 Watt

PRO WX 3100 has 115.4% lower power consumption.

RTX A4000, on the other hand, has a 656.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 3100 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
Radeon PRO WX 3100
NVIDIA RTX A4000
RTX A4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 57 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 649 votes

Rate RTX A4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO WX 3100 or RTX A4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.