Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Radeon PRO WX 3100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO WX 3100 with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

PRO WX 3100
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 65 Watt
6.59

T1200 Mobile outperforms PRO WX 3100 by a whopping 195% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking563285
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.13no data
Power efficiency7.0775.24
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameLexaTU117
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date12 June 2017 (7 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121024
Core clock speed925 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate39.0191.20
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO WX 3100 6.59
T1200 Mobile 19.43
+195%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

PRO WX 3100 3691
T1200 Mobile 14387
+290%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

PRO WX 3100 11702
T1200 Mobile 44135
+277%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

PRO WX 3100 2671
T1200 Mobile 10134
+279%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

PRO WX 3100 18522
T1200 Mobile 50827
+174%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12
−383%
58
+383%
1440p10−12
−230%
33
+230%
4K27−30
−200%
81
+200%

Cost per frame, $

1080p16.58no data
1440p19.90no data
4K7.37no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−191%
30−35
+191%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−159%
40−45
+159%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−488%
47
+488%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−242%
65−70
+242%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−191%
30−35
+191%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−333%
65
+333%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−194%
50−55
+194%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−186%
120−130
+186%
Hitman 3 12−14
−200%
35−40
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−53.8%
60
+53.8%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−194%
50−55
+194%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−168%
59
+168%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−3.8%
54
+3.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−159%
40−45
+159%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−250%
28
+250%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−242%
65−70
+242%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−191%
30−35
+191%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−293%
59
+293%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−194%
50−55
+194%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−186%
120−130
+186%
Hitman 3 12−14
−200%
35−40
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−20.5%
47
+20.5%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−283%
65−70
+283%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−194%
50−55
+194%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−100%
44
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−238%
71
+238%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+10.6%
47
−10.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−159%
40−45
+159%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−163%
21
+163%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−191%
30−35
+191%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−273%
56
+273%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−186%
120−130
+186%
Hitman 3 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−182%
110−120
+182%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−173%
60−65
+173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−429%
37
+429%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+174%
19
−174%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−800%
18
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−413%
41
+413%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−429%
110−120
+429%
Hitman 3 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+250%
12
−250%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Hitman 3 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−472%
100−110
+472%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 4−5
Far Cry 5 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 32
+0%
32
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how PRO WX 3100 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 383% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 230% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the PRO WX 3100 is 250% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • PRO WX 3100 is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
  • T1200 Mobile is ahead in 48 tests (72%)
  • there's a draw in 16 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.59 19.43
Recency 12 June 2017 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 18 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 194.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 261.1% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 3100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a workstation card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
Radeon PRO WX 3100
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 53 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 141 vote

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.