UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) vs Radeon PRO WX 2100

Place in performance ranking	613	812
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.95	no data
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	Gen. 12 (2021)
GPU code name	Polaris 12	Alder Lake Xe
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	21 March 2018 (6 years ago)	3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	no data
Current price	$343 (2.3x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	24
Core clock speed	no data	450 MHz
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz	750 MHz
Number of transistors	2,200 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	39.01	no data
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon PRO WX 2100 and UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	48 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	no data
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12_1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

14−16
+100%

−100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

8−9
+167%

3−4

−167%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Battlefield 5	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +77.8%	9−10 −77.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%
Hitman 3	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +81.8%	11 −81.8%
Metro Exodus	10−11	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +60%	10 −60%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Battlefield 5	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +33.3%	12 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +267%	3 −267%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%
Hitman 3	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +150%	8 −150%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +66.7%	6 −66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +220%	5 −220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +25%	8 −25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +77.8%	9−10 −77.8%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +33.3%	14−16 −33.3%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +66.7%	6 −66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +100%	5 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14
+160%

5−6

−160%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Hitman 3	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Far Cry 5	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Metro Exodus	2−3	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	12−14 +62.5%	8−9 −62.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3	0−1
Hitman 3	1−2	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6
+66.7%

3−4

−66.7%

This is how PRO WX 2100 and UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) compete in popular games:

PRO WX 2100 is 100% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the PRO WX 2100 is 300% faster than the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N).

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, PRO WX 2100 surpassed UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) in all 48 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.74	2.34
Recency	21 March 2018	3 January 2023
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm

The Radeon PRO WX 2100 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Radeon PRO WX 2100

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Radeon PRO WX 2100

Quadro M520

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 33 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

4.2 36 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.