Radeon HD 7310 vs PRO WX 2100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	617	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.51	no data
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	Polaris 12	Zacate
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	21 March 2018 (6 years ago)	1 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	80
Core clock speed	no data	500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	2,200 million	450 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	18 Watt
Texture fill rate	39.01	4.000
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops	no data
Floating-point performance	1.248 gflops	0.08 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	48 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

+

-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	21 March 2018	1 May 2012
Chip lithography	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	18 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---