GeForce GTX 570M vs Radeon PRO WX 2100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 3100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 560M GTX 560M SLI GTX 570M GTX 580M GTX 580M SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO WX 2100 with GeForce GTX 570M, including specs and performance data.

PRO WX 2100
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 35 Watt
4.81

GTX 570M outperforms PRO WX 2100 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

PRO WX 2100 PRO WX 2100
GTX 570M GTX 570M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking649648
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.72no data
Power efficiency9.454.44
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameLexaGF114
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date4 June 2017 (7 years ago)28 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512336
Core clock speed925 MHz575 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate39.0132.20
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPS0.7728 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs3256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8MXM-B (3.0)
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s72.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
3D Blu-Ray-+
3D Gaming-+
Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 API
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

PRO WX 2100 4.81
GTX 570M 4.84
+0.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO WX 2100 1854
GTX 570M 1863
+0.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p35−40
−5.7%
37
+5.7%
Full HD50−55
−6%
53
+6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.98no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how PRO WX 2100 and GTX 570M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 570M is 6% faster in 900p
  • GTX 570M is 6% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 570M is 13% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 570M is ahead in 8 tests (13%)
  • there's a draw in 55 tests (87%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.81 4.84
Recency 4 June 2017 28 June 2011
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 75 Watt

PRO WX 2100 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

GTX 570M, on the other hand, has a 0.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon PRO WX 2100 and GeForce GTX 570M.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 570M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon PRO WX 2100
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
GeForce GTX 570M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 2100
vs
Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070
GTX 570M GeForce GTX 570M
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 2100
vs
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
HD 8180 HD 8180
vs
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
HD 8180 HD 8180
vs
HD Graphics 4600 HD Graphics 4600
UHD Graphics 64EU UHD Graphics 64EU
vs
HD Graphics 610 HD Graphics 610
RTX 5000 RTX 5000
vs
P5000 Max-Q P5000 Max-Q
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770
vs
PRO WX 9100 PRO WX 9100
HD Graphics (Braswell) HD Graphics (Braswell)
vs
Iris Graphics 5100 Iris Graphics 5100
R5 430 OEM R5 430 OEM
vs
FX 3800 FX 3800
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
vs
Quadro 6000 6000
ATI GameCube GPU GameCube GPU
vs
Volari Duo V5 Ultra
Instinct Vega Instinct Vega
vs
GeForce 6600 6600

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 50 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 28 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 570M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO WX 2100 or GeForce GTX 570M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.