GeForce GT 730 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO WX 2100 with GeForce GT 730, including specs and performance data.

PRO WX 2100
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 35 Watt
4.23
+127%

PRO 2100 outperforms 730 by a whopping 127% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking691923
Place by popularitynot in top-10040
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.950.19
Power efficiency9.733.06
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameLexaGF108
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 June 2017 (8 years ago)18 June 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 $59.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

PRO WX 2100 has 400% better value for money than GT 730.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51296
Core clock speed925 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt49 Watt
Texture fill rate39.0111.2 GT/s
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPS0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs3216
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache256 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mm145 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

PRO WX 2100 4.23
+127%
GT 730 1.86

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO WX 2100 1869
+127%
Samples: 224
GT 730 824
Samples: 11212

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Fortnite 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Valorant 55−60
+142%
24−27
−142%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+163%
30−33
−163%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Dota 2 35−40
+144%
16−18
−144%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Fortnite 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Valorant 55−60
+142%
24−27
−142%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Dota 2 35−40
+144%
16−18
−144%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Valorant 55−60
+142%
24−27
−142%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
Valorant 45−50
+133%
21−24
−133%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Valorant 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.23 1.86
Recency 4 June 2017 18 June 2014
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 49 Watt

PRO WX 2100 has a 127.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO WX 2100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 730 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 730 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon PRO WX 2100
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GeForce GT 730

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 54 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 6937 votes

Rate GeForce GT 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO WX 2100 or GeForce GT 730, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.