GeForce GT 650M SLI vs Radeon PRO WX 2100

Place in performance ranking	611	588
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.98	0.68
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Polaris 12	N13E-GE
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	21 March 2018 (6 years ago)	22 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	no data
Current price	$343 (2.3x MSRP)	$545

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO WX 2100 has 338% better value for money than GT 650M SLI.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	768
Core clock speed	no data	790 MHz
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz	835 MHz
Number of transistors	2,200 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	39.01	no data
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon PRO WX 2100 and GeForce GT 650M SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2x2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	2x 128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	48 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	no data
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	11
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	no data
CUDA	no data	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	70−75 −12.9%	79 +12.9%
Full HD	45−50 −11.1%	50 +11.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

8−9

+0%

8−9

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Hitman 3	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Hitman 3	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Hitman 3	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Hitman 3	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1