Radeon RX 9070 vs PRO W7800

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking19not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation33.58no data
Power efficiency19.51no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameNavi 31Navi 48
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 April 2023 (1 year ago)March 2025
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44804096
Core clock speed1895 MHz2070 MHz
Boost clock speed2525 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors57,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate707.0645.1
Floating-point processing power45.25 TFLOPS20.64 TFLOPS
ROPs12896
TMUs280256
Ray Tracing Cores7064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length280 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s624.1 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.11x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 220 Watt

PRO W7800 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 9070, on the other hand, has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 18.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7800 and Radeon RX 9070. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7800 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 9070 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7800
AMD Radeon RX 9070
Radeon RX 9070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 36 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 46 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7800 or Radeon RX 9070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.