Radeon RX 7900M vs PRO W7800

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W7800 with Radeon RX 7900M, including specs and performance data.

PRO W7800
2023
32 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
73.96
+23%

PRO W7800 outperforms RX 7900M by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1433
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation31.10no data
Power efficiency19.6323.04
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 31Navi 31
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 April 2023 (1 year ago)19 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44804608
Core clock speed1895 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speed2525 MHz2090 MHz
Number of transistors57,700 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate707.0601.9
Floating-point processing power45.25 TFLOPS38.52 TFLOPS
ROPs128192
TMUs280288
Ray Tracing Cores7072

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length280 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO W7800 73.96
+23%
RX 7900M 60.11

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W7800 28439
+23%
RX 7900M 23115

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD190−200
+20.3%
158
−20.3%
1440p140−150
+20.7%
116
−20.7%
4K110−120
+19.6%
92
−19.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p13.15no data
1440p17.85no data
4K22.72no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Elden Ring 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 131
+0%
131
+0%
Dota 2 139
+0%
139
+0%
Elden Ring 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Far Cry 5 84
+0%
84
+0%
Fortnite 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 139
+0%
139
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130
+0%
130
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 344
+0%
344
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 106
+0%
106
+0%
Elden Ring 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 106
+0%
106
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
World of Tanks 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 249
+0%
249
+0%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 146
+0%
146
+0%
Elden Ring 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 146
+0%
146
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 146
+0%
146
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 131
+0%
131
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

This is how PRO W7800 and RX 7900M compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7800 is 20% faster in 1080p
  • PRO W7800 is 21% faster in 1440p
  • PRO W7800 is 20% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 73.96 60.11
Recency 13 April 2023 19 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 16 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 180 Watt

PRO W7800 has a 23% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 7900M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO W7800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7900M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7800 is a workstation card while Radeon RX 7900M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7800
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
Radeon RX 7900M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 35 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 62 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.