RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon PRO W7800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W7800 with RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

PRO W7800
2023
32 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
73.80
+17.7%

PRO W7800 outperforms RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1631
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation29.90no data
Power efficiency19.4619.10
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 31DG2-512
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 April 2023 (1 year ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44804096
Core clock speed1855 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed2499 MHz1680 MHz
Number of transistors57,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate699.7no data
Floating-point processing power44.78 TFLOPSno data
ROPs128no data
TMUs280no data
Ray Tracing Cores70no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length280 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz20000 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO W7800 73.80
+17.7%
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 62.69

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W7800 28439
+17.7%
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 24158

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 73.80 62.69
Recency 13 April 2023 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 225 Watt

PRO W7800 has a 17.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has 15.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO W7800 is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7800 is a workstation card while RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7800
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 35 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 9 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.