Radeon RX 6500M vs PRO W7600

Place in performance ranking	62	254
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	75.02	no data
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022)	RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Navi 33	Navi 24
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	3 August 2023 (less than a year ago)	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$599	no data
Current price	$579 (1x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	1024
Boost clock speed	2440 MHz	2191 MHz
Number of transistors	13,300 million	5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	312.3	153.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon PRO W7600 and Radeon RX 6500M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	18 GB/s	18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x DisplayPort 2.1

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO W7600 46.76
+130%

RX 6500M 20.35

PRO W7600 outperforms RX 6500M by 130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

PRO W7600 18057
+130%

RX 6500M 7859

PRO W7600 outperforms RX 6500M by 130% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

140−150
+126%

−126%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

150−160

+127%

66
−127%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 +125%	40−45 −125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	140−150 +126%	62 −126%
Battlefield 5	150−160 +124%	65−70 −124%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 +120%	40−45 −120%
Cyberpunk 2077	150−160 +124%	67 −124%
Far Cry 5	100−105 +113%	45−50 −113%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 +122%	50−55 −122%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 +128%	90−95 −128%
Hitman 3	140−150 +130%	61 −130%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190 +125%	80−85 −125%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +121%	65−70 −121%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +118%	55−60 −118%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	260−270 +128%	114 −128%
Watch Dogs: Legion	160−170 +129%	70 −129%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 +125%	40−45 −125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 +122%	45 −122%
Battlefield 5	150−160 +124%	65−70 −124%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 +120%	40−45 −120%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 +119%	32 −119%
Far Cry 5	100−105 +113%	45−50 −113%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 +122%	50−55 −122%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 +128%	90−95 −128%
Hitman 3	110−120 +120%	50 −120%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190 +125%	80−85 −125%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +121%	65−70 −121%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +118%	55−60 −118%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	210−220 +121%	95 −121%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	130−140 +128%	57 −128%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +130%	60−65 −130%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 +125%	40−45 −125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	85−90 +118%	39 −118%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 +120%	40−45 −120%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +124%	29 −124%
Far Cry 5	100−105 +113%	45−50 −113%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 +128%	90−95 −128%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190 +125%	80−85 −125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	190−200 +129%	83 −129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 +118%	39 −118%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +120%	25 −120%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

+118%

55−60
−118%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +118%	35−40 −118%
Far Cry New Dawn	90−95 +120%	40−45 −120%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +114%	21−24 −114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +111%	18−20 −111%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +112%	24−27 −112%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +125%	12−14 −125%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +121%	30−35 −121%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +125%	40−45 −125%
Hitman 3	55−60 +129%	24−27 −129%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +126%	40−45 −126%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +124%	35−40 −124%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	95−100 +126%	40−45 −126%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +117%	21−24 −117%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +114%	14−16 −114%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

75−80
+121%

30−35

−121%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +125%	20−22 −125%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 +100%	14−16 −100%
Hitman 3	35−40 +119%	16−18 −119%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +117%	21−24 −117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +114%	14−16 −114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +114%	21−24 −114%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +125%	12−14 −125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +110%	10−11 −110%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +118%	10−12 −118%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +118%	10−12 −118%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +114%	27−30 −114%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +117%	21−24 −117%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +111%	18−20 −111%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%