Radeon Graphics 320SP vs PRO W7600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking126not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation69.64no data
Power efficiency19.64no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 33Renoir
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2023 (1 year ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048320
Core clock speedno data400 MHz
Boost clock speed2440 MHz1400 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate312.328.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.896 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs12820

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8IGP
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed18 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2023 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 6 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 15 Watt

PRO W7600 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

Graphics 320SP, on the other hand, has 766.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7600 and Radeon Graphics 320SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7600 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics 320SP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP
Radeon Graphics 320SP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 320SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.