ATI Radeon E4690 vs PRO W7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W7600 with Radeon E4690, including specs and performance data.

PRO W7600
2023, $599
8 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
38.65
+3885%

PRO W7600 outperforms E4690 by a whopping 3885% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1301166
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation37.89no data
Power efficiency22.892.49
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 33RV730
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2023 (2 years ago)1 June 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048320
Core clock speedno data600 MHz
Boost clock speed2440 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate312.319.20
ROPs648
TMUs12832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8MXM-II
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed18 GB/s1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s22.4 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)10.1
Shader Model6.74.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.21.0
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

PRO W7600 38.65
+3885%
ATI E4690 0.97

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W7600 16266
+3916%
Samples: 77
ATI E4690 405
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.65 0.97
Recency 3 August 2023 1 June 2009
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 6 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 30 Watt

PRO W7600 has a 3885% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 817% more advanced lithography process.

ATI E4690, on the other hand, has 333% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO W7600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon E4690 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7600 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon E4690 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 8 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon E4690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7600 or Radeon E4690, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.