ATI Radeon 9000 PRO vs PRO W7600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking124not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation38.54no data
Power efficiency23.20no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameNavi 33RV250
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2023 (2 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speedno data275 MHz
Boost clock speed2440 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate312.31.100
ROPs644
TMUs1284

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8AGP 4x
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed18 GB/s275 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s8.8 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.11x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)8.1
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL2.2N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2023 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 6 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 28 Watt

PRO W7600 has an age advantage of 21 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9000 PRO, on the other hand, has 364.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7600 and Radeon 9000 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7600 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9000 PRO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
ATI Radeon 9000 PRO
Radeon 9000 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 15 votes

Rate Radeon 9000 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7600 or Radeon 9000 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.