GeForce FX 5200 Ultra Mac Edition vs Radeon PRO W7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking123not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation38.55no data
Power efficiency23.24no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameNavi 33NV34 A2
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2023 (2 years ago)6 March 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speedno data325 MHz
Boost clock speed2440 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Wattno data
Texture fill rate312.31.300
ROPs644
TMUs1284

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8AGP Pro 8x
Length241 mm171 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed18 GB/s325 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s10.4 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.12x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0a
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL2.2N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2023 6 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 6 nm 150 nm

PRO W7600 has an age advantage of 20 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7600 and GeForce FX 5200 Ultra Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7600 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce FX 5200 Ultra Mac Edition is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra Mac Edition
GeForce FX 5200 Ultra Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate GeForce FX 5200 Ultra Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7600 or GeForce FX 5200 Ultra Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.