GeForce 7900 GS vs Radeon PRO W7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W7600 with GeForce 7900 GS, including specs and performance data.

PRO W7600
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
39.12
+6420%

PRO W7600 outperforms 7900 GS by a whopping 6420% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1201238
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation37.500.01
Power efficiency22.920.93
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 33G71
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2023 (2 years ago)1 May 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $259

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

PRO W7600 has 374900% better value for money than 7900 GS.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speedno data450 MHz
Boost clock speed2440 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 million278 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt49 Watt
Texture fill rate312.39.000
ROPs6416
TMUs12820

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Length241 mm198 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed18 GB/s660 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s42.24 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.12x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.73.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.2N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

PRO W7600 39.12
+6420%
7900 GS 0.60

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W7600 16393
+6379%
7900 GS 253

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.12 0.60
Recency 3 August 2023 1 May 2006
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 6 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 49 Watt

PRO W7600 has a 6420% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

7900 GS, on the other hand, has 165.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO W7600 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7900 GS in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7600 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 7900 GS is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS
GeForce 7900 GS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 42 votes

Rate GeForce 7900 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7600 or GeForce 7900 GS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.