Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs Radeon PRO W7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
PRO W7500 PRO W7600 PRO W7700 PRO W7800 PRO W7800 48 GB PRO W7900
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
3000 Mobile 3000 Max-Q 3000 Mobile Refresh 3000 X2 Mobile 4000 Mobile 4000 Max-Q 5000 Mobile 5000 Max-Q 5000 Mobile Refresh 5000 X2 Mobile 6000 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W7500 with Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

PRO W7500
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
31.83
+2.4%

PRO W7500 outperforms RTX 4000 Mobile by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
PRO W7500 PRO W7500
RTX 4000 Mobile RTX 4000 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking192200
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation39.89no data
Power efficiency34.8921.68
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 33TU104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date3 August 2023 (2 years ago)27 May 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922560
Core clock speed1500 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate190.4249.6
Floating-point processing power12.19 TFLOPS7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs112160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Cores2840
L0 Cache448 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KB2.5 MB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length216 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1344 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth172.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1No outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.21.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
−7%
107
+7%
1440p60−65
−5%
63
+5%
4K45−50
−4.4%
47
+4.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.29no data
1440p7.15no data
4K9.53no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 101
+0%
101
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 106
+0%
106
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 87
+0%
87
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 132
+0%
132
+0%
Far Cry 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 143
+0%
143
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 81
+0%
81
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 127
+0%
127
+0%
Far Cry 5 96
+0%
96
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+0%
75
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 66
+0%
66
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+0%
51
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 106
+0%
106
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how PRO W7500 and RTX 4000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 7% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 5% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 4% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 31.83 31.08
Recency 3 August 2023 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 6 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 110 Watt

PRO W7500 has a 2.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 57.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon PRO W7500 and Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7500 is a workstation graphics card while Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

PRO W7500 Radeon PRO W7500
vs
RTX A2000 RTX A2000
RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
vs
Pro Vega 64 Radeon Pro Vega 64
PRO W7500 Radeon PRO W7500
vs
Pro W6600X Radeon Pro W6600X
RX 7600 Radeon RX 7600
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
RX 6800M Radeon RX 6800M
vs
RX 7600 RX 7600
RX 7600 Radeon RX 7600
vs
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server PRO 6000 Blackwell Server
PRO W7500 Radeon PRO W7500
vs
7500 LE GeForce 7500 LE
PRO W7500 Radeon PRO W7500
vs
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
PRO W7500 Radeon PRO W7500
vs
Pro 5700 XT Pro 5700 XT
PRO W7500 Radeon PRO W7500
vs
RX 9070 RX 9070
PRO W7600 Radeon PRO W7600
vs
GTX 1070 SLI Mobile GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
PRO W7600 Radeon PRO W7600
vs
GTX 570 GTX 570
PRO W7600 Radeon PRO W7600
vs
ATI HD 3610 HD 3610

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 22 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 45 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7500 or Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.