Arc Pro B60 vs Radeon PRO W7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W7500 and Arc Pro B60, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

PRO W7500
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
30.17
+2%

PRO W7500 outperforms Pro B60 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking189197
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation39.2332.79
Power efficiency34.7411.92
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameNavi 33BMG-G21
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date3 August 2023 (2 years ago)5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

PRO W7500 has 20% better value for money than Arc Pro B60.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922560
Core clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate190.4384.0
Floating-point processing power12.19 TFLOPS12.29 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs112160
Ray Tracing Cores2820
L0 Cache448 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x8
Length216 mm167 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1344 MHz2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth172.0 GB/s456.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.14x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.4

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

PRO W7500 30.17
+2%
Arc Pro B60 29.58

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W7500 13338
+2%
Samples: 96
Arc Pro B60 13079
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.17 29.58
Recency 3 August 2023 5 September 2025
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 200 Watt

PRO W7500 has a 2% higher aggregate performance score, and 185.7% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro B60, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon PRO W7500 and Arc Pro B60.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
Intel Arc Pro B60
Arc Pro B60

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 22 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 13 votes

Rate Arc Pro B60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7500 or Arc Pro B60, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.