RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs Radeon PRO W6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W6300 and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

PRO W6300
2022
2 GB GDDR6, 25 Watt
12.57

PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF outperforms PRO W6300 by a whopping 440% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking40720
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency40.5078.13
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameNavi 24GB203
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date19 January 2022 (3 years ago)11 August 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7688960
Core clock speed1512 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speed2040 MHz1337 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate97.92374.4
Floating-point processing power3.133 TFLOPS23.96 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs48280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Cores1270
L0 Cache192 KBno data
L1 Cache256 KB8.8 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB48 MB
L3 Cache8 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2 GB24 GB
Memory bus width32 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

PRO W6300 12.57
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 67.89
+440%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W6300 5559
Samples: 8
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 30019
+440%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.57 67.89
Recency 19 January 2022 11 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 70 Watt

PRO W6300 has 180% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, on the other hand, has a 440.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO W6300 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W6300
Radeon PRO W6300
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W6300 or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.