RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon PRO W6300
Aggregated performance score
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Radeon PRO W6300 by 139% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 323 | 124 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2022) | Ada Lovelace |
| GPU code name | Navi 24 | no data |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 19 January 2022 (2 years ago) | 21 March 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 3072 |
| Boost clock speed | 2040 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 5,400 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP) |
| Texture fill rate | 97.92 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon PRO W6300 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 32 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 16 GB/s | 16000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 2.2 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 15.24 | 36.48 |
| Recency | 19 January 2022 | 21 March 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 115 Watt |
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO W6300 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon PRO W6300 is a workstation card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
