RTX A5500 Mobile vs Radeon Next

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated110
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.11
ArchitectureGCN 6.0Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 10GA103
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release dateno data22 March 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data7424
Core clock speed1000 MHz975 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistorsno data22,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data165 Watt
Texture fill rateno data348.0
Floating-point processing powerno data22.27 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58
L1 Cacheno data7.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm

Radeon Next has a 14% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Next and RTX A5500 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Next is a desktop graphics card while RTX A5500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 11 votes

Rate Radeon Next on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 19 votes

Rate RTX A5500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Next or RTX A5500 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.