Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile vs Radeon Instinct MI300X

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)Xe-LPG (2023)
GPU code nameAqua VanjaramMeteor Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores194561024
Core clock speed1000 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHz2250 MHz
Number of transistors153,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)750 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate2,554144.0
Floating-point processing power81.72 TFLOPS4.608 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUs121664
Tensor Cores1216no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16Ring Bus
WidthOAM Moduleno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount192 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width8192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2525 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth5,171 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (12_1)
Shader ModelN/A6.6
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 750 Watt 28 Watt

Instinct MI300X has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile, on the other hand, has 2578.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Instinct MI300X and Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Instinct MI300X is a workstation graphics card while Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X
Radeon Instinct MI300X
Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile
Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 57 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 14 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.