Radeon Instinct MI300A vs Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe-LPG (2023)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake GT1Aqua Vanjaram
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102419456
Core clock speed300 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed2250 MHz2100 MHz
Number of transistorsno data153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt750 Watt
Texture fill rate144.02,554
Floating-point processing power4.608 TFLOPS81.72 TFLOPS
ROPs32no data
TMUs641216
Tensor Coresno data1216
L1 Cacheno data4.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data16 MB
L3 Cacheno data256 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno dataOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared192 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared8192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2525 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data10.3 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.6N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 750 Watt

Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile has 2578.6% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI300A, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile and Radeon Instinct MI300A. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI300A is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile
Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300A
Radeon Instinct MI300A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 242 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile or Radeon Instinct MI300A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.