RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile vs Radeon Instinct MI25

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Instinct MI25 with RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Instinct MI25
2017
16 GB HBM2, 300 Watt
9.96

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile outperforms MI25 by a whopping 237% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking475158
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.6860.23
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameVega 10GB206
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date27 June 2017 (8 years ago)19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096 ×23328
Core clock speed1400 MHz952 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate384.0 ×2151.3
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS ×29.684 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×232
TMUs256 ×2104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26
L1 Cache1 MB3.3 MB
L2 Cache4 MB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount16 GB ×28 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed852 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth436.2 GB/s ×2448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−271%
130
+271%
1440p18−21
−283%
69
+283%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how Instinct MI25 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 271% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 283% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 20 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.96 33.59
Recency 27 June 2017 19 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 45 Watt

Instinct MI25 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, on the other hand, has a 237.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Instinct MI25 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Instinct MI25 is a workstation graphics card while RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
Radeon Instinct MI25
NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 13 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI25 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Instinct MI25 or RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.