GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Radeon Instinct MI25

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Instinct MI25 with GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, including specs and performance data.

Instinct MI25
2017
16 GB HBM2, 300 Watt
12.95

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms Instinct MI25 by a whopping 538% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3926
Place by popularitynot in top-10082
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data48.91
Power efficiency2.9819.99
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10AD103
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date27 June 2017 (7 years ago)8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40968448
Core clock speed1400 MHz2340 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2610 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rate384.0689.0
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS44.1 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs256264
Tensor Coresno data264
Ray Tracing Coresno data66

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm310 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed852 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth436.2 GB/s672.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Instinct MI25 12.95
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 82.59
+538%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Instinct MI25 4978
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 31759
+538%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−546%
226
+546%
1440p24−27
−554%
157
+554%
4K14−16
−586%
96
+586%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.54
1440pno data5.09
4Kno data8.32

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 189
+0%
189
+0%
Elden Ring 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 189
+0%
189
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 467
+0%
467
+0%
Metro Exodus 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 171
+0%
171
+0%
Dota 2 174
+0%
174
+0%
Elden Ring 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Far Cry 5 150
+0%
150
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 442
+0%
442
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 174
+0%
174
+0%
Metro Exodus 79
+0%
79
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150
+0%
150
+0%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 407
+0%
407
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 155
+0%
155
+0%
Elden Ring 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 155
+0%
155
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
World of Tanks 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 95
+0%
95
+0%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 306
+0%
306
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 159
+0%
159
+0%
Valorant 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Dota 2 182
+0%
182
+0%
Elden Ring 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 182
+0%
182
+0%
Metro Exodus 84
+0%
84
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 182
+0%
182
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 162
+0%
162
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

This is how Instinct MI25 and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 546% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 554% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 586% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.95 82.59
Recency 27 June 2017 8 January 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 285 Watt

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a 537.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 5.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Instinct MI25 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Instinct MI25 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
Radeon Instinct MI25
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 13 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI25 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2955 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.