Radeon HD 6930 vs ATI IGP 350M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon IGP 350M with Radeon HD 6930, including specs and performance data.
HD 6930 outperforms IGP 350M by a whopping 67400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1572 | 604 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 1.90 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 2.79 |
| Architecture | Rage 6 (2000−2007) | TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) |
| GPU code name | RS200 | Cayman |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 October 2002 (23 years ago) | 1 December 2011 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $180 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 183 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 30 million | 2,640 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 180 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 186 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 0.37 | 60.00 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 1.92 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 2 | 32 |
| TMUs | 2 | 80 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 512 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | AGP 4x | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 220 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 153.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 7.0 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.4 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.01 | 6.75 |
| Recency | 5 October 2002 | 1 December 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 40 nm |
HD 6930 has a 67400% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon HD 6930 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon IGP 350M in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon IGP 350M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 6930 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
