Radeon RX 5700 XT vs ATI IGP 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon IGP 320M with Radeon RX 5700 XT, including specs and performance data.

ATI IGP 320M
2002
0.01

RX 5700 XT outperforms ATI IGP 320M by a whopping 418100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking153094
Place by popularitynot in top-10041
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data46.06
Power efficiencyno data13.05
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameRS100Navi 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 October 2002 (22 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores22560
Core clock speed160 MHz1605 MHz
Boost clock speed160 MHz1905 MHz
Number of transistors30 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rate0.16304.8
Floating-point processing powerno data9.754 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs1160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data272 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI IGP 320M 0.01
RX 5700 XT 41.82
+418100%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI IGP 320M 3
RX 5700 XT 16455
+548400%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1129
1440p-0−178
4K-0−149

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.09
1440pno data5.12
4Kno data8.14

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−17400%
175
+17400%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−1229%
93
+1229%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7700%
78
+7700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−13200%
133
+13200%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−986%
76
+986%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7700%
78
+7700%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−15400%
155
+15400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2850%
177
+2850%
Valorant 24−27
−1204%
313
+1204%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−7700%
78
+7700%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−814%
64
+814%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
−3375%
270−280
+3375%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7400%
75
+7400%
Dota 2 8−9
−1050%
92
+1050%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−15300%
154
+15300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2667%
166
+2667%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−5033%
154
+5033%
Valorant 24−27
−1125%
294
+1125%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−714%
57
+714%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6600%
67
+6600%
Dota 2 8−9
−1188%
103
+1188%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−14700%
148
+14700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2217%
139
+2217%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−3000%
93
+3000%
Valorant 24−27
−563%
159
+563%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 170−180

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 119
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 75−80

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−427%
79
+427%
Valorant 1−2
−24100%
242
+24100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−5200%
53
+5200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−5200%
53
+5200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−2150%
45
+2150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 119
+0%
119
+0%
Far Cry 5 138
+0%
138
+0%
Fortnite 223
+0%
223
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 130
+0%
130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Far Cry 5 130
+0%
130
+0%
Fortnite 179
+0%
179
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
+0%
145
+0%
Metro Exodus 97
+0%
97
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 105
+0%
105
+0%
Far Cry 5 111
+0%
111
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 104
+0%
104
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 143
+0%
143
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
+0%
79
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
Valorant 286
+0%
286
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+0%
40
+0%
Far Cry 5 97
+0%
97
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 72
+0%
72
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 93
+0%
93
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+0%
54
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8
+0%
8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+0%
17
+0%
Dota 2 93
+0%
93
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 79
+0%
79
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 37
+0%
37
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 5700 XT is 24100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT is ahead in 30 tests (47%)
  • there's a draw in 34 tests (53%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 41.82
Recency 5 October 2002 7 July 2019
Chip lithography 180 nm 7 nm

RX 5700 XT has a 418100% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, and a 2471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon IGP 320M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon IGP 320M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 5700 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 320M
Radeon IGP 320M
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 17 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 8396 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon IGP 320M or Radeon RX 5700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.