RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs ATI Radeon IGP 320M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon IGP 320M with RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

ATI IGP 320M
2002
0.01

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms IGP 320M by a whopping 356200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1583155
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data54.76
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRS100AD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date5 October 2002 (23 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23072
Core clock speed160 MHz1635 MHz
Boost clock speed160 MHz2115 MHz
Number of transistors30 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate0.16203.0
Floating-point processing powerno data12.99 TFLOPS
ROPs148
TMUs196
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI IGP 320M 0.01
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 35.63
+356200%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI IGP 320M 3
Samples: 11
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 14907
+496800%
Samples: 1539

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−354900%
7100−7150
+354900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−355733%
21350−21400
+355733%
Valorant 21−24
−355987%
81900−81950
+355987%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−356011%
32050−32100
+356011%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−355614%
24900−24950
+355614%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−354900%
7100−7150
+354900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−355733%
21350−21400
+355733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−355900%
17800−17850
+355900%
Valorant 21−24
−355987%
81900−81950
+355987%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−355614%
24900−24950
+355614%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−354900%
7100−7150
+354900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−355733%
21350−21400
+355733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−355900%
17800−17850
+355900%
Valorant 21−24
−355987%
81900−81950
+355987%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−354900%
7100−7150
+354900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 1−2
−354900%
3550−3600
+354900%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−354900%
3550−3600
+354900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−355971%
49850−49900
+355971%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−354900%
3550−3600
+354900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−354900%
3550−3600
+354900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 35.63
Recency 5 October 2002 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 180 nm 5 nm

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 356200% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 20 years, and a 3500% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon IGP 320M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon IGP 320M is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 320M
Radeon IGP 320M
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 17 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 42 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon IGP 320M or RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.