GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile vs ATI Radeon IGP 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon IGP 320M and GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI IGP 320M
2002
0.01

RTX 5050 Mobile outperforms ATI IGP 320M by a whopping 478600% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking156373
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data72.94
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameRS100GB207
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 October 2002 (22 years ago)24 June 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores22560
Core clock speed160 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed160 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors30 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology180 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate0.16201.6
Floating-point processing powerno data12.9 TFLOPS
ROPs132
TMUs180
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 5.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI IGP 320M 0.01
RTX 5050 Mobile 47.87
+478600%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI IGP 320M 3
RTX 5050 Mobile 20277
+675800%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−474900%
4750−4800
+474900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2783%
170−180
+2783%
Valorant 21−24
−1070%
260−270
+1070%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−3000%
270−280
+3000%
Dota 2 7−8
−478471%
33500−33550
+478471%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−474900%
4750−4800
+474900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2783%
170−180
+2783%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−4625%
180−190
+4625%
Valorant 21−24
−1070%
260−270
+1070%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 7−8
−478471%
33500−33550
+478471%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−474900%
4750−4800
+474900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2783%
170−180
+2783%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−4625%
180−190
+4625%
Valorant 21−24
−478596%
110100−110150
+478596%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−613%
110−120
+613%
Valorant 1−2
−28700%
280−290
+28700%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−7700%
75−80
+7700%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−6900%
70−75
+6900%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5050 Mobile is 28700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5050 Mobile is ahead in 12 tests (33%)
  • there's a draw in 24 tests (67%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 47.87
Recency 5 October 2002 24 June 2025
Chip lithography 180 nm 5 nm

RTX 5050 Mobile has a 478600% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 22 years, and a 3500% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon IGP 320M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 320M
Radeon IGP 320M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 17 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 64 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon IGP 320M or GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.