NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs AMD Radeon HD 8970M

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

HD 8970M
10.00

GeForce GTX 765M SLI outperforms Radeon HD 8970M by 6% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking412394
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money10.9411.13
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameNeptuneno data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 May 2013 (10 years old)30 May 2013 (10 years old)
Current price$135 $149
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 765M SLI has 2% better value for money than HD 8970M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801536
Core clock speed850 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,800 million2x 2540 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate72.00no data
Floating-point performance2,304 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 8970M and GeForce GTX 765M SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
SLI optionsno data+

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2x 2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2x 128 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8970M 10.00
GTX 765M SLI 10.58
+5.8%

GeForce GTX 765M SLI outperforms Radeon HD 8970M by 6% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 8970M 18667
GTX 765M SLI 25021
+34%

GeForce GTX 765M SLI outperforms Radeon HD 8970M by 34% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 8970M 6818
GTX 765M SLI 7944
+16.5%

GeForce GTX 765M SLI outperforms Radeon HD 8970M by 17% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 8970M 5039
GTX 765M SLI 5073
+0.7%

GeForce GTX 765M SLI outperforms Radeon HD 8970M by 1% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 8970M 31027
GTX 765M SLI 35376
+14%

GeForce GTX 765M SLI outperforms Radeon HD 8970M by 14% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

HD 8970M 56
GTX 765M SLI 68
+21.5%

GeForce GTX 765M SLI outperforms Radeon HD 8970M by 21% in Unigine Heaven 3.0.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD53
−34%
71
+34%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−5.9%
35−40
+5.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−3.7%
27−30
+3.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−8%
27−30
+8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−3.7%
27−30
+3.7%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−5.7%
35−40
+5.7%
Hitman 3 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−10%
21−24
+10%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−5.9%
35−40
+5.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−3.7%
27−30
+3.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−8%
27−30
+8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−3.7%
27−30
+3.7%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−5.7%
35−40
+5.7%
Hitman 3 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−10%
21−24
+10%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
+40.9%
21−24
−40.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−5.9%
35−40
+5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−8%
27−30
+8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−3.7%
27−30
+3.7%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−5.7%
35−40
+5.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
−22.2%
21−24
+22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hitman 3 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−11.8%
18−20
+11.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hitman 3 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how HD 8970M and GTX 765M SLI compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 765M SLI is 34% faster than HD 8970M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 8970M is 40.9% faster than the GTX 765M SLI.
  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 765M SLI is 25% faster than the HD 8970M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 8970M is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • GTX 765M SLI is ahead in 49 tests (72%)
  • there's a draw in 18 tests (26%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 10.00 10.58
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 130 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8970M and GeForce GTX 765M SLI. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8970M
Radeon HD 8970M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
GeForce GTX 765M SLI

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 41 vote

Rate AMD Radeon HD 8970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 24 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.