Radeon R5 M430 vs HD 8850M

Place in the ranking	827	937
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code name	Venus	Exo
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 April 2013 (11 years ago)	15 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	320
Core clock speed	575 MHz	1030 MHz
Boost clock speed	625 MHz	1030 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	690 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	unknown
Texture fill rate	25.00	20.60
Floating-point processing power	0.8 TFLOPS	0.6592 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	8
TMUs	40	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	32 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8850M 2.52
+50%

R5 M430 1.68

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8850M 973
+50.2%

R5 M430 648

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 8850M 2349
+39.1%

R5 M430 1689

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 8850M 8223
+75.1%

R5 M430 4697

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 8850M 1845
+83.8%

R5 M430 1004

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 8850M 11387
+107%

R5 M430 5493

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

23
+76.9%

−76.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6
+25%

4−5

−25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	3−4	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Hitman 3	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +25%	16−18 −25%
Metro Exodus	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +8.8%	30−35 −8.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	3−4	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Hitman 3	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +25%	16−18 −25%
Metro Exodus	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −23.1%	16 +23.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +8.8%	30−35 −8.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Hitman 3	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +25%	16−18 −25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +8.8%	30−35 −8.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
+100%

3−4

−100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Hitman 3	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +66.7%	9−10 −66.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
+50%

4−5

−50%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
+33.3%

3−4

−33.3%

This is how HD 8850M and R5 M430 compete in popular games:

HD 8850M is 77% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD 8850M is 140% faster.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R5 M430 is 23% faster.

All in all, in popular games: