GeForce4 MX 420 PCI vs Radeon HD 8790M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking726not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameMarsNV17 A3
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2013 (11 years ago)6 February 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed850 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknownno data
Texture fill rate21.601.000
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s1.328 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)8.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2013 6 February 2002
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

HD 8790M has an age advantage of 11 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8790M and GeForce4 MX 420 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8790M is a notebook card while GeForce4 MX 420 PCI is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8790M
Radeon HD 8790M
NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 420 PCI
GeForce4 MX 420 PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 329 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8790M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate GeForce4 MX 420 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.