RTX A4500 Mobile vs Radeon HD 8770M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 8770M with RTX A4500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
RTX A4500 Mobile outperforms HD 8770M by a whopping 1342% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 844 | 120 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 21.75 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | Ampere (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | Mars | GA104 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 1 April 2013 (12 years ago) | 22 March 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 5888 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 825 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 950 million | 17,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 140 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 19.80 | 276.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.6336 TFLOPS | 17.66 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 96 |
| TMUs | 24 | 184 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 184 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 46 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 5.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.6 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 54
−1289%
| 750−800
+1289%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−2344%
|
220−230
+2344%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−1467%
|
90−95
+1467%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 9−10
−1400%
|
130−140
+1400%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−2344%
|
220−230
+2344%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−1467%
|
90−95
+1467%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 10−11
−1110%
|
120−130
+1110%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
−1500%
|
120−130
+1500%
|
| Fortnite | 14−16
−1129%
|
170−180
+1129%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−1000%
|
150−160
+1000%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 6−7
−2000%
|
120−130
+2000%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−1100%
|
150−160
+1100%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
−413%
|
230−240
+413%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 9−10
−1400%
|
130−140
+1400%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−2344%
|
220−230
+2344%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 50−55
−425%
|
270−280
+425%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−1467%
|
90−95
+1467%
|
| Dota 2 | 27−30
−437%
|
140−150
+437%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 10−11
−1110%
|
120−130
+1110%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
−1500%
|
120−130
+1500%
|
| Fortnite | 14−16
−1129%
|
170−180
+1129%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−1000%
|
150−160
+1000%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 6−7
−2000%
|
120−130
+2000%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 7−8
−1786%
|
130−140
+1786%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
−1820%
|
95−100
+1820%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−1100%
|
150−160
+1100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−1340%
|
140−150
+1340%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
−413%
|
230−240
+413%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 9−10
−1400%
|
130−140
+1400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−1467%
|
90−95
+1467%
|
| Dota 2 | 27−30
−437%
|
140−150
+437%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 10−11
−1110%
|
120−130
+1110%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
−1500%
|
120−130
+1500%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−1000%
|
150−160
+1000%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−1100%
|
150−160
+1100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−1340%
|
140−150
+1340%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
−413%
|
230−240
+413%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 14−16
−1129%
|
170−180
+1129%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
−1600%
|
100−110
+1600%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 21−24
−1238%
|
280−290
+1238%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−5800%
|
55−60
+5800%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
−600%
|
170−180
+600%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−948%
|
260−270
+948%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−2250%
|
45−50
+2250%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 6−7
−1483%
|
95−100
+1483%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−1840%
|
95−100
+1840%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−1543%
|
110−120
+1543%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−1825%
|
75−80
+1825%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 5−6
−2040%
|
100−110
+2040%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−487%
|
85−90
+487%
|
| Valorant | 14−16
−1643%
|
240−250
+1643%
|
4K
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−1313%
|
110−120
+1313%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 1−2
−4900%
|
50−55
+4900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−5200%
|
50−55
+5200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−3750%
|
75−80
+3750%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−1733%
|
55−60
+1733%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4
−1667%
|
50−55
+1667%
|
1440p
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
This is how HD 8770M and RTX A4500 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX A4500 Mobile is 1289% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A4500 Mobile is 5800% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX A4500 Mobile performs better in 56 tests (89%)
- there's a draw in 7 tests (11%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.75 | 39.65 |
| Recency | 1 April 2013 | 22 March 2022 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 8 nm |
RTX A4500 Mobile has a 1341.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8770M in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon HD 8770M is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
