Radeon RX 7600 XT vs HD 8750M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8750M with Radeon RX 7600 XT, including specs and performance data.

HD 8750M
2013
1 GB GDDR5
2.64

RX 7600 XT outperforms HD 8750M by a whopping 1592% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking81780
Place by popularitynot in top-10083
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data76.87
Power efficiencyno data16.19
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameMarsNavi 33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 February 2013 (11 years ago)8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speed670 MHz1980 MHz
Boost clock speed775 MHz2755 MHz
Number of transistors950 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data190 Watt
Texture fill rate16.08352.6
Floating-point processing power0.5146 TFLOPS22.57 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs24128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data204 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)2.2
Vulkan1.2.1701.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8750M 2.64
RX 7600 XT 44.68
+1592%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8750M 1014
RX 7600 XT 17177
+1594%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p23
−1422%
350−400
+1422%
Full HD20
−1400%
300−350
+1400%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.10

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
Elden Ring 5−6
−1500%
80−85
+1500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1592%
220−230
+1592%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
Dota 2 7−8
−1471%
110−120
+1471%
Elden Ring 5−6
−1500%
80−85
+1500%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−1588%
270−280
+1588%
Fortnite 14−16
−1543%
230−240
+1543%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1592%
220−230
+1592%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−1471%
110−120
+1471%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−1500%
400−450
+1500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%
World of Tanks 54
−1567%
900−950
+1567%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
Dota 2 7−8
−1471%
110−120
+1471%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−1588%
270−280
+1588%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1592%
220−230
+1592%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−1500%
400−450
+1500%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−1567%
300−310
+1567%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
World of Tanks 18−20
−1567%
300−310
+1567%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−1567%
150−160
+1567%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1471%
110−120
+1471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Valorant 9−10
−1567%
150−160
+1567%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−1588%
270−280
+1588%
Elden Ring 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1567%
250−260
+1567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1471%
110−120
+1471%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1567%
250−260
+1567%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Dota 2 16−18
−1588%
270−280
+1588%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Fortnite 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Valorant 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%

This is how HD 8750M and RX 7600 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600 XT is 1422% faster in 900p
  • RX 7600 XT is 1400% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.64 44.68
Recency 26 February 2013 8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm

RX 7600 XT has a 1592.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8750M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8750M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8750M
Radeon HD 8750M
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
Radeon RX 7600 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 212 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 738 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.