Radeon 630 vs HD 8750M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8750M and Radeon 630, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 8750M
2013
1 GB GDDR5
2.59

630 outperforms HD 8750M by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking824709
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.40
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameMarsPolaris 23
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date26 February 2013 (11 years ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speed670 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speed775 MHz1218 MHz
Number of transistors950 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate16.0838.98
Floating-point processing power0.5146 TFLOPS1.247 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)2.0
Vulkan1.2.1701.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 8750M 2.59
Radeon 630 3.84
+48.3%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8750M 1018
Radeon 630 1512
+48.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p23
−30.4%
30−35
+30.4%
Full HD20
−35%
27−30
+35%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
Atomic Heart 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Atomic Heart 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Fortnite 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−25%
14−16
+25%
Valorant 40−45
−20.9%
50−55
+20.9%
Atomic Heart 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 54
−24.1%
65−70
+24.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Dota 2 24−27
−36%
30−35
+36%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Fortnite 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−25%
14−16
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Valorant 40−45
−20.9%
50−55
+20.9%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Dota 2 24−27
−36%
30−35
+36%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−25%
14−16
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Valorant 40−45
−20.9%
50−55
+20.9%
Fortnite 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−55.6%
27−30
+55.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Valorant 21−24
−77.3%
35−40
+77.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Fortnite 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Atomic Heart 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Valorant 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 1−2
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Fortnite 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how HD 8750M and Radeon 630 compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 630 is 30% faster in 900p
  • Radeon 630 is 35% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 630 is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 630 is ahead in 57 tests (95%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.59 3.84
Recency 26 February 2013 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

Radeon 630 has a 48.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8750M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8750M
Radeon HD 8750M
AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6
213 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5
33 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8750M or Radeon 630, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.