GeForce GT 325M vs Radeon HD 8750M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8750M and GeForce GT 325M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 8750M
2013
1 GB GDDR5
2.62
+495%

HD 8750M outperforms GT 325M by a whopping 495% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8171244
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.31
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameMarsGT216
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date26 February 2013 (11 years ago)10 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38448
Core clock speed670 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed775 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data23 Watt
Texture fill rate16.087.200
Floating-point processing power0.5146 TFLOPS0.09504 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data142
ROPs88
TMUs2416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHzUp to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s22.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentDual Link DVIDisplayPortHDMIVGASingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)4.1
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)1.1
Vulkan1.2.170N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8750M 2.62
+495%
GT 325M 0.44

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark Vantage Performance

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8750M 1009
+497%
GT 325M 169

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 8750M 6840
+217%
GT 325M 2161

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p23
+667%
3−4
−667%
Full HD20
+567%
3−4
−567%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Hitman 3 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+35.7%
27−30
−35.7%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Hitman 3 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+35.7%
27−30
−35.7%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Hitman 3 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+35.7%
27−30
−35.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5 0−1
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Hitman 3 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 0−1
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

This is how HD 8750M and GT 325M compete in popular games:

  • HD 8750M is 667% faster in 900p
  • HD 8750M is 567% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 8750M is 250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, HD 8750M surpassed GT 325M in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.62 0.44
Recency 26 February 2013 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

HD 8750M has a 495.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 8750M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 325M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8750M
Radeon HD 8750M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
GeForce GT 325M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6
210 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5
12 votes

Rate GeForce GT 325M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.