Quadro FX 550M vs Radeon HD 8750A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameMarsG73
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date2 February 2013 (12 years ago)13 March 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed600 MHz480 MHz
Number of transistors950 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate14.405.760
Floating-point processing power0.4608 TFLOPSno data
ROPs88
TMUs2412
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 February 2013 13 March 2006
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

HD 8750A has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

FX 550M, on the other hand, has 28.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8750A and Quadro FX 550M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8750A is a notebook graphics card while Quadro FX 550M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8750A
Radeon HD 8750A
NVIDIA Quadro FX 550M
Quadro FX 550M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8750A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8750A or Quadro FX 550M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.