GeForce G105M vs Radeon HD 8750A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1372
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.76
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameMarsGT218
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 February 2013 (12 years ago)16 July 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3848
Core clock speed600 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors950 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate14.404.000
Floating-point processing power0.4608 TFLOPS0.03424 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data38
ROPs84
TMUs248
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GBUp to 512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz500 (DDR2)/700 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s8 (DDR2)/11 (GDDR3)

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortHDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 February 2013 16 July 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 14 Watt

HD 8750A has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce G105M, on the other hand, has 221.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8750A and GeForce G105M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8750A
Radeon HD 8750A
NVIDIA GeForce G105M
GeForce G105M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8750A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 74 votes

Rate GeForce G105M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8750A or GeForce G105M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.