Radeon HD 4650 vs HD 8670D

Place in performance ranking	968	1159
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.06	no data
Architecture	Terascale 3 (2010−2013)	TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code name	Richland	RV730
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	4 June 2013 (11 years ago)	10 September 2008 (15 years ago)
Current price	$89	$154

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 8670D and ATI HD 4650 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	320
Core clock speed	844 MHz	600 MHz
Boost clock speed	950 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,303 million	514 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	48 Watt
Texture fill rate	22.80	19.20
Floating-point performance	no data	384.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	193 mm
Width	IGP	1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	256 MB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	22.4 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	5.0	4.1
OpenGL	4.4	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8670D 1.37
+121%

ATI HD 4650 0.62

HD 8670D outperforms HD 4650 by 121% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD 8670D 529
+121%

ATI HD 4650 239

HD 8670D outperforms HD 4650 by 121% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

19
+138%

8−9

−138%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5
+300%

1−2

−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Hitman 3	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Hitman 3	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	1−2	0−1
Hitman 3	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
+300%

1−2

−300%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn	1−2	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2	0−1
Metro Exodus	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%