GeForce 8800M GTS vs Radeon HD 8670D

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8670D with GeForce 8800M GTS, including specs and performance data.

HD 8670D
2013
100 Watt
1.17
+36%

HD 8670D outperforms 8800M GTS by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10781166
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.941.39
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameDevastatorG92
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 March 2013 (12 years ago)1 November 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38464
Core clock speed844 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate22.8016.00
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS0.16 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2432
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPMXM-HE
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data51.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 8670D 1.17
+36%
8800M GTS 0.86

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8670D 518
+35.6%
Samples: 1044
8800M GTS 382
Samples: 36

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 8670D 6241
+145%
8800M GTS 2552

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
+50%
12−14
−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Fortnite 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+6.5%
30−35
−6.5%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+26.1%
21−24
−26.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Fortnite 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 10
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Valorant 30−35
+6.5%
30−35
−6.5%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Valorant 30−35
+6.5%
30−35
−6.5%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Valorant 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how HD 8670D and 8800M GTS compete in popular games:

  • HD 8670D is 50% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD 8670D is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 8670D performs better in 28 tests (70%)
  • there's a draw in 12 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.17 0.86
Recency 12 March 2013 1 November 2007
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 50 Watt

HD 8670D has a 36% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

8800M GTS, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 8670D is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800M GTS in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8670D is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 8800M GTS is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8670D
Radeon HD 8670D
NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS
GeForce 8800M GTS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 73 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8670D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 19 votes

Rate GeForce 8800M GTS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8670D or GeForce 8800M GTS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.