GeForce RTX 5090 D vs Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics with GeForce RTX 5090 D, including specs and performance data.
RTX 5090 D outperforms HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics by a whopping 4067% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 867 | 1 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 9 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 22.15 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 13.26 |
| Architecture | no data | Blackwell 2.0 (2025) |
| GPU code name | no data | GB202 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 August 2013 (12 years ago) | 30 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,299 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 21760 |
| Core clock speed | 720 / 775 MHz | 2017 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2407 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 92,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 575 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 1,636.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 104.8 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 176 |
| TMUs | no data | 680 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 680 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 170 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 304 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR7 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 32 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 - 2000 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 1.79 TB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.4 |
| CUDA | - | 12.0 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 29
−4038%
| 1200−1250
+4038%
|
Cost per frame, $
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
−4067%
|
250−260
+4067%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−3900%
|
200−210
+3900%
|
| God of War | 7−8
−4043%
|
290−300
+4043%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 8−9
−3650%
|
300−310
+3650%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
−4067%
|
250−260
+4067%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−3900%
|
200−210
+3900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8
−4043%
|
290−300
+4043%
|
| Fortnite | 12−14
−4067%
|
500−550
+4067%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
−3746%
|
500−550
+3746%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 5−6
−3900%
|
200−210
+3900%
|
| God of War | 7−8
−4043%
|
290−300
+4043%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−4067%
|
500−550
+4067%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
−4067%
|
1750−1800
+4067%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 8−9
−3650%
|
300−310
+3650%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
−4067%
|
250−260
+4067%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 45−50
−4067%
|
2000−2050
+4067%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−3900%
|
200−210
+3900%
|
| Dota 2 | 24−27
−3900%
|
1000−1050
+3900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8
−4043%
|
290−300
+4043%
|
| Fortnite | 12−14
−4067%
|
500−550
+4067%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
−3746%
|
500−550
+3746%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 5−6
−3900%
|
200−210
+3900%
|
| God of War | 7−8
−4043%
|
290−300
+4043%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 6−7
−4067%
|
250−260
+4067%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
−3900%
|
160−170
+3900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−4067%
|
500−550
+4067%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
−3789%
|
350−400
+3789%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
−4067%
|
1750−1800
+4067%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 8−9
−3650%
|
300−310
+3650%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−3900%
|
200−210
+3900%
|
| Dota 2 | 24−27
−3900%
|
1000−1050
+3900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8
−4043%
|
290−300
+4043%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
−3746%
|
500−550
+3746%
|
| God of War | 7−8
−4043%
|
290−300
+4043%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−4067%
|
500−550
+4067%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
−3789%
|
350−400
+3789%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
−4067%
|
1750−1800
+4067%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 12−14
−4067%
|
500−550
+4067%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
−3900%
|
200−210
+3900%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 18−20
−4067%
|
750−800
+4067%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 1−2
−3900%
|
40−45
+3900%
|
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
−4030%
|
950−1000
+4030%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
−3948%
|
850−900
+3948%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−3900%
|
40−45
+3900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−3900%
|
120−130
+3900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−4067%
|
250−260
+4067%
|
| God of War | 1−2
−3900%
|
40−45
+3900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−3900%
|
80−85
+3900%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 4−5
−3900%
|
160−170
+3900%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−3963%
|
650−700
+3963%
|
| Valorant | 12−14
−4067%
|
500−550
+4067%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Dota 2 | 6−7
−4067%
|
250−260
+4067%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−3900%
|
40−45
+3900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−3900%
|
80−85
+3900%
|
| God of War | 1−2
−3900%
|
40−45
+3900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−3900%
|
120−130
+3900%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 3−4
−3900%
|
120−130
+3900%
|
This is how HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics and RTX 5090 D compete in popular games:
- RTX 5090 D is 4038% faster in 900p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.40 | 100.00 |
| Recency | 1 August 2013 | 30 January 2025 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 5 nm |
RTX 5090 D has a 4066.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 5090 D is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 5090 D is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
