GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics with GeForce GTX 1650, including specs and performance data.

HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
2013
2.67

GTX 1650 outperforms HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics by a whopping 667% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking817274
Place by popularitynot in top-1003
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data38.19
Power efficiencyno data18.81
Architectureno dataTuring (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTU117
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 August 2013 (11 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768896
Core clock speed720 / 775 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data93.24
Floating-point processing powerno data2.984 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 - 2000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 2.67
GTX 1650 20.49
+667%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 2398
GTX 1650 13645
+469%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 7479
GTX 1650 44694
+498%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 845
GTX 1650 9203
+989%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 6379
GTX 1650 50549
+692%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p29
−659%
220−230
+659%
Full HD8−9
−763%
69
+763%
1440p5−6
−700%
40
+700%
4K2−3
−1050%
23
+1050%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.16
1440pno data3.73
4Kno data6.48

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−236%
35−40
+236%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−486%
40−45
+486%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1000%
66
+1000%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−236%
35−40
+236%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−143%
17
+143%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−623%
94
+623%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−2900%
60
+2900%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1550%
66
+1550%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−670%
77
+670%
Valorant 2−3
−4150%
85
+4150%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1150%
75
+1150%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−236%
35−40
+236%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−100%
14
+100%
Dota 2 7−8
−1071%
82
+1071%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−463%
90
+463%
Fortnite 14−16
−486%
82
+486%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−469%
74
+469%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−971%
75
+971%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1000%
44
+1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−448%
130−140
+448%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−180%
28
+180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
Valorant 2−3
−2200%
46
+2200%
World of Tanks 45−50
−380%
230−240
+380%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−817%
55
+817%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−236%
35−40
+236%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−71.4%
12
+71.4%
Dota 2 7−8
−1214%
92
+1214%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−325%
65−70
+325%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−377%
62
+377%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−1950%
41
+1950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−144%
61
+144%
Valorant 2−3
−3400%
70
+3400%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 1−2
−3200%
30−35
+3200%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−3200%
30−35
+3200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−805%
170−180
+805%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−750%
17
+750%
World of Tanks 18−20
−672%
130−140
+672%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−1800%
38
+1800%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−75%
7
+75%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−700%
55−60
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4400%
45
+4400%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−967%
30−35
+967%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−383%
27−30
+383%
Valorant 9−10
−344%
40
+344%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Dota 2 16−18
−81.3%
29
+81.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−93.3%
29
+93.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−786%
60−65
+786%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−93.3%
29
+93.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−800%
18
+800%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3
+50%
Dota 2 16−18
−269%
59
+269%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Fortnite 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 26
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%
Valorant 2−3
−950%
21
+950%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Metro Exodus 41
+0%
41
+0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%

This is how HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics and GTX 1650 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 is 659% faster in 900p
  • GTX 1650 is 763% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 is 700% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 is 1050% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1650 is 4400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 is ahead in 61 test (97%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.67 20.49
Recency 1 August 2013 23 April 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

GTX 1650 has a 667.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 20 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650G HD 8670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 24430 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.