GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics and GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
2013
2.40

GT 750M Mac Edition outperforms HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking865717
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data6.08
Architectureno dataKepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameno dataGK107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 August 2013 (12 years ago)8 November 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768384
Core clock speed720 / 775 MHz926 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data29.63
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7112 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 - 2000 MHz1254 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80.26 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 2.40
GT 750M Mac Edition 3.99
+66.3%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 7479
GT 750M Mac Edition 10049
+34.4%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 845
GT 750M Mac Edition 1837
+117%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p29
−55.2%
45−50
+55.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
God of War 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Fortnite 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
God of War 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Valorant 40−45
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
−56.3%
75−80
+56.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Dota 2 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Fortnite 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
God of War 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Valorant 40−45
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Dota 2 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
God of War 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Valorant 40−45
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%
Valorant 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
God of War 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Valorant 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
God of War 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

This is how HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics and GT 750M Mac Edition compete in popular games:

  • GT 750M Mac Edition is 55% faster in 900p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.40 3.99
Recency 1 August 2013 8 November 2013

GT 750M Mac Edition has a 66.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 months.

The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 20 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650G HD 8670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 27 votes

Rate GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics or GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.