GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache vs Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking937not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataCurie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameno dataNV44 A2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 August 2013 (12 years ago)15 December 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed720 / 650 MHz350 MHz
Number of transistorsno data75 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Texture fill rateno data1.400
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amountno data64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 - 2000 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX119.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 2013 15 December 2004
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm

HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics and GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache
GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 18 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650G HD 8570M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 11 votes

Rate GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics or GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.