Quadro FX 500 vs Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking939not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataRankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameno dataNV34 A1
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 August 2013 (12 years ago)21 May 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed720 / 975 MHz270 MHz
Number of transistorsno data45 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Texture fill rateno data1.080
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz240 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data7.68 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX119.0a
OpenGLno data1.5 (2.1)
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 2013 21 May 2003
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics and Quadro FX 500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics is a notebook graphics card while Quadro FX 500 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
NVIDIA Quadro FX 500
Quadro FX 500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 23 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8550G HD 8670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics or Quadro FX 500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.